Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Now apply this reasoning to Trump standing in Air Force One and saying that he would bring someone back of the Supreme Court said to. It's on video.


I spent 10+ minutes trying to find anything Trump has said on camera about the copyright office, and went through the only video I could find of Trump on air force one in the past week to see any references to this, and saw none.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/trump-if-supre...

It's not related to copyright. It is an example of your hypothetical standard required to attribute something to Trump. My point is that even when he is on camera saying something, that does not prevent the post facto rationalizations. Even if he was on tape firing this person, people would rationalize this away too.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: